Barrett's 2022 Strength of Schedule: Quarterbacks


We hope you enjoy this FREE article preview! In order to access our other articles and content, including livestreams, projections and rankings, stat analysis and more, be sure to sign up today. We are here to help you #ScoreMore Fantasy Points!

Barrett's 2022 Strength of Schedule: Quarterbacks

Never Bury the Lede: The difference between Daniel Jones’ schedule last year and his schedule this year was the difference between him finishing 18th and 14th in fantasy points per game started.

Which quarterbacks have the toughest or easiest fantasy schedules this year? Which quarterbacks had the toughest or easiest schedules last year? Or, what about the toughest or easiest schedules in the fantasy postseason this year? Or to start the season? Which quarterbacks saw their schedules improve the most or least? How big of an impact was that change in schedule? Can we quantify that change in real terms using fantasy points?

Luckily for our subscribers, we can answer all of these questions and more. But in order to do so, we first had to quantify strength of schedule (SOS). This is typically done by calculating a defense’s FPG allowed average, and then looking at the average for all players over a full season. This will also be our approach; however, we’ll be taking things one step further – we’re going to use a control for the opposing offense by measuring FPG over an opponent’s average.

For instance, last season, opposing quarterbacks averaged +4.2 fantasy points per game over their season-long average when facing Washington, which ranked worst in the league. (Washington was the most favorable fantasy matchup for opposing quarterbacks — worth, on average, an additional 4.2 fantasy points per game.) On the opposite end of the spectrum, quarterbacks fell short of their season-long average by 5.2 points when facing the Patriots, which ranked best in the league. (In other words, the Patriots were the toughest fantasy matchup for opposing quarterbacks.)

Ah then, you might ask, do defenses get the benefit of being “tough” matchups because bad QB play against them is dragging the numbers down? Not for this study. The strength of schedule (SOS) average used in this study controls for quality of opponent by eliminating a QB’s own performance against a defense when measuring that individual’s SOS. So this SOS study filters out the notion that the quarterback being studied was responsible for his own schedule difficulty — I measure the QB’s SOS by measuring how his peers performed relative to their average against a particular defense. In essence, the defenses playing Baker Mayfield don’t simply look tough statistically because they were playing Baker Mayfield during a bad season, because I control for that.

Calculating these numbers for all teams and then applying the full-season average for all players quantifies in real terms which players had the easiest and most difficult schedules for fantasy last year. We can also use these numbers to project out strength of schedule for each team and each position in 2022.

While this methodology isn’t perfect — of course roster turnover and coaching changes will complicate things — strength of schedule doesn’t not matter. This data is still far more actionable than it is not. In fantasy football — like in poker — there may only be small edges to be gained, but those small edges can be compounded to yield a massive advantage. And they must be taken advantage of… and are, by the most dominant players. That’s the case with strength of schedule. It’s another small edge to be realized, and at the polar extremes, it might matter a lot more than you’d expect.

Here’s an example: last season, Daniel Jones had the 9th-toughest schedule among all fantasy quarterbacks. His average matchup was worth -0.27 team quarterback] FPG. Because he was responsible for just about 100% of the fantasy points generated by New York’s quarterbacks last year (in games he started), we can say that – adjusted for strength of schedule, or if he had a perfectly average strength of schedule last year – he would have scored an additional +0.27 fantasy points per start. This would have been the difference between him finishing 18th in fantasy points per start (15.8) and 16th (16.1). Looking forward, Jones’ schedule is much-improved (most-improved at the position), very soft (softest at the position), and worth an additional +0.97 fantasy points per game in real terms. Essentially, if he had this schedule last year, he should have scored 17.1 fantasy points per start, which would have ranked 14th-best.

Clearly, strength of schedule – something totally outside of a player’s control and entirely due to luck – can have a big impact for fantasy.

Other Positions:

Running Backs

Wide Receivers (coming soon)

Tight Ends (coming soon)

Best Overall Schedule (2021)

1. Matthew Stafford, Average Matchup: +0.80

2. Jimmy Garoppolo (+0.64)

3. Russell Wilson (+0.60)

4. Joe Burrow (+0.55)

5. Teddy Bridgewater (+0.53)

Worst Overall Schedule (2021)

1. Zach Wilson (-0.75)

2. Tom Brady (-0.61)

3. Davis Mills (-0.60)

4. Matt Ryan (-0.53)

5. Taylor Heinicke (-0.48)

6. Tua Tagovailoa (-0.47)

2022 Schedule

PDF Download available here.

CSV Download available here.

Best Overall Schedule (Weeks 1-17)

1. Daniel Jones (+0.97)

2. Russell Wilson (+0.86)

3. Trevor Lawrence (+0.80)

4. Dak Prescott (+0.44)

5. Jalen Hurts (+0.42)

Worst Overall Schedule (Weeks 1-17)

1. Lamar Jackson (-1.13)

2. Zach Wilson (-1.05)

3. Joe Burrow (-0.68)

4. Tua Tagovailoa (-0.63)

t5. Kyler Murray (-0.39)

t5. Aaron Rodgers (-0.39)

Off to a Hot Start (First Five Weeks)

1. Trevor Lawrence (+1.60)

2. Jalen Hurts (+1.54)

3. Matt Ryan (+0.80)

4. Jameis Winston (+0.78)

5. Deshaun Watson/Cleveland fill-in (+0.70)

Slow Starters (First Five Weeks)

1. Kenny Pickett / Mitchell Trubisky (-1.70)

2. Lamar Jackson (-1.56)

3. Aaron Rodgers (-1.18)

4. Sam Darnold (-1.08)

t5. Marcus Mariota (-1.06)

t5. Jimmy Garoppolo / Trey Lance (-1.06)

Best Playoff Schedule (Weeks 15-17)

1. Daniel Jones (+2.10)

2. Deshaun Watson (+1.73)

3. Davis Mills (+1.70)

4. Drew Lock / Geno Smith (+1.67)

5. Jimmy Garoppolo / Trey Lance (+1.37)

Worst Playoff Schedule (Weeks 15-17)

1. Joe Burrow (-2.77)

2. Tua Tagovailoa (-2.30)

3. Derek Carr (-2.27)

4. Jalen Hurts (-1.53)

5. Carson Wentz (-1.20)

Schedule Change (In Real Points)

Most Improved Schedule

1. Daniel Jones (+1.27)

2. Trevor Lawrence (+0.96)

3. Davis Mills (+0.86)

4. Matt Ryan (+0.63)

5. Ryan Tannehill (+0.60)

Least Improved Schedule

1. Joe Burrow (-1.23)

2. Lamar Jackson (-0.88)

3. Matthew Stafford (-0.83)

4. Aaron Rodgers (-0.50)

5. Derek Carr (-0.34)

Thoughts/Notes/Dank Stats

1) No quarterback will benefit more from an improved schedule this year than Daniel Jones. (Explained in more detail in the introduction.)

In addition to the league’s most-improved strength of schedule – and also the league’s best postseason schedule (+2.10) – Jones has a major coaching upgrade (Joe Judge to Brian Daboll), and sport the best supporting cast of his career. Kenny Golladay and Saquon Barkley dealt with injury throughout the 2021 season, while Kadarius Toney and Sterling Shepard also missed a combined 17 games. The Giants have since added Round 1 OT Evan Neal and Round 2 WR Wan’Dale Robinson.

Jones has gained at least 45 rushing yards in 24% of his starts over the past two seasons, not far off that of Josh Allen (27%). And he’s flashed a sky-high ceiling throughout his career, hitting at least 27.5 fantasy points in 16.3% of his career starts, which ranks sandwiched in between Aaron Rodgers (16.7%) and Joe Burrow (15.4%) over the same span. So, add it all up and Jones looks like an ideal streaming candidate for redraft leagues, and a strong value in best ball leagues (ADP: QB25) given his high weekly ceiling. As an added bonus, his top stacking options are all exceedingly cheap in best ball leagues: Kadarius Toney (WR47), Kenny Golladay (WR54), Sterling Shepard (WR92), Wan'Dale Robinson (WR93), and Ricky Seals-Jones (TE41).

2) I think the odds are good we will see Kenny Pickett starting at some point this season. Even if he can’t beat out Mitchell Trubisky in training camp, I have a hard time imagining Trubisky will hold onto the job for long, especially after Pittsburgh’s gauntlet-like schedule to start the season. The Steelers have the overall toughest schedule through the first five weeks of the season (-1.70), and then the 5th-softest schedule across the remaining 12 weeks (+0.57). So, don’t be surprised if the leash gets pulled on Trubisky some time prior to Week 6, and Pickett puts up better numbers in his stead.

Similarly, we could also see an early-season QB-change from San Francisco (5th-toughest to 6th-easiest) or Carolina (4th-toughest to 8th-easiest).

3) Trevor Lawrence is an ideal late-round target for QB-streamers. He has by far the softest schedule over the first five weeks of the season (+1.60), including a juicy Week 1 matchup against a Washington defense which gave up the most schedule-adjusted FPG to opposing QBs last season (+4.2).

That said… While I like Lawrence’s upside – he was labeled as a sure-fire can’t-miss Andrew Luck-caliber prospect coming out of college, and then was saddled with (arguably) the most incompetent coaching staff ever assembled – I’m more pessimistic than most. Lawrence was labeled as such by the NFL Mock Draft cognizanti, but multiple film experts I trust had him ranked behind Zach Wilson and/or Mac Jones. And Lawrence’s rookie season wasn’t just bad, it was apocalyptically bad. He led the league in interceptions (17), and from Weeks 9-16, Lawrence threw just one touchdown pass over eight games (273 passes thrown). Lawrence’s 7 games with 24-plus passes and zero passing touchdowns is the most by any rookie QB ever, and is more than Deshaun Watson, Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen, and Baker Mayfield have in their respective careers.

4) Tua Tagovailoa was the most matchup-sensitive QB for fantasy last season (+/-6.1), averaging 18.2 FPG in matchups ranking better than average (six such games) and only 12.2 FPG in matchups ranking tougher than average (six such games). Unfortunately for him, his schedule is a bit tougher this season (-0.15) and ranks 4th-toughest overall (-0.63).

That said, I don’t have any issue with Tagovailoa’s current price-tag (ADP: QB18). He averaged 16.2 FPG in games started and finished last season (QB16). After averaging 16.6 FPG in games started and finished (minus benchings) in his rookie season. Following the arrival of Tyreek Hill, and now another year removed from hip surgery, I believe an Alex Smith 2017-like season could be within Tagovailoa’s range of outcomes.

5) Jalen Hurts was similarly matchup-sensitive (+/-5.0), averaging 25.0 FPG in matchups ranking better than average (eight such games) and only 20.0 FPG in matchups ranking tougher than average (seven such games). If you’re in a trade-happy league, I’d consider drafting Hurts alongside a competent QB2 (perhaps Deshaun Watson would be ideal). You may be able to sell him for a small fortune by Week 6 – Philadelphia has the 2nd-softest schedule through the first five weeks of the season (+1.54), and the 4th-toughest schedule in the fantasy playoffs (-1.53).

6) Joe Burrow ranks as the QB5 by ADP, five spots ahead of Dak Prescott and six spots ahead of Matthew Stafford. Last season Burrow finished 10th in fantasy points per start (20.5), sandwiched in between Prescott (20.7) and Stafford (20.4).

Burrow was gifted the league’s 4th-softest schedule last year (+0.55), but now has the 3rd-toughest projected schedule this year (-0.68), resulting in the worst projected change in schedule, worth in real terms -1.23 FPG off his 2021 average. In other words, he’d rank 1.8 FPG behind Prescott and 0.3 FPG behind Stafford by schedule-adjusted FPG.

I typically avoid non-Konami Code QBs being drafted this high, but in light of Burrow’s difficult schedule – which also includes the position’s toughest postseason schedule (-2.77) – he’s an especially easy fade for me at current ADP. Prescott and Stafford, however, are far more enticing to me at cost.

7) Cleveland’s QBs will have positive matchups in five of their final six games, including the league’s 2nd-softest playoff schedule (+1.73), which includes a best-possible matchup against Washington in the championship round (+4.2). Deshaun Watson currently ranks as the QB15 by ADP. But through four NFL seasons, Watson has finished 6th (23.1), 2nd (21.4), 5th (20.7), and 1st in FPG (24.1). So, even if he’s suspended for 6-8 games to start the year, I’d consider gambling on him (and his league-winning upside for later in the season, when points matter most) at that ADP in non-best ball leagues.

8) Aaron Rodgers could be an intriguing mid-season trade target. He has the league’s 3rd-toughest schedule through the first five weeks of the season (-1.18), and then a perfectly neutral schedule across the remaining 12 weeks (0.0). Perhaps you can acquire him cheaply in Week 6 if his owner has become disappointed with his production and is growing impatient.

9) During CBS’ Week 1 broadcast (CLE @ KC), Tony Romo had this to say (unprompted) about Zach Wilson: “He’s going to be really good. Now, their team is a work in progress… But, you see the talent? Oh my gosh! He’s going to be amazing in 2-3 years. I mean, this year they’re going to struggle and he’s going to look average… But I can see the ceiling is very high.”

Prior to the NFL Draft, various anonymous scouts said the following: “He will not be the 1st pick in the draft, but he should be.” Another scout said: “He’s a combination of Kyler Murray and Patrick Mahomes.”

Wilson fell well short of those loft comparisons in his rookie season, finishing 3rd-worst in PFF pass grade (54.8) and dead-last in passer rating (69.7). Really, so much – chiefly, the success of my biggest fantasy man-crush: Elijah Moore – hinges upon Wilson taking that crucial next-step, ideally following the career path Romo outlined above.

Obviously, that remains to be seen. But, I like the Wilson-Moore stack quite a bit for best ball leagues. There’s a lot of volatility to the Wilson projection; it wouldn’t shock me if he again ranked as one of the worst QBs in the league, to Moore’s detriment and my great disappointment. But it also wouldn’t shock me if Romo was right, and, now buoyed by a massively improved supporting cast, Wilson took the league by storm while making a Josh Allen-like sophomore leap.

Unfortunately his schedule isn’t doing him many favors. The Jets have the league’s 2nd-toughest strength of schedule (-1.05) this year.

10) Lamar Jackson has the 2nd-worst projected schedule change of any QB, worth in real terms -0.88 FPG off his average. For perspective, this would have represented a fall from QB7 (21.2 FPG) to QB11 (20.2) last year.

Over the last three seasons Baltimore has finished 1st (+249), 1st (+165), and 19th (-5) in point differential. Add to that their RB1, RB2, and RB3 all suffering season-ending injuries in training camp, and Baltimore had no other choice but to unleash Jackson and lean atypically pass-heavy (57%, up from 45%). Unfortunately, the results weren’t great.

Despite hitting a career-high in pass attempts per game (19% more than his prior career-high), Jackson hit a new career-low in fantasy points per start in 2021. And his fantasy point per dropback average has now fallen in three straight seasons: 0.91 (best ever), 0.76 (best), and then 0.54 (10th). Worse yet, of 35-qualifiers, Jackson ranked 13th-worst in PFF pass grade (65.9) and 12th-worst in passer rating (87.0).

Perhaps Jackson was never meant to be a high-volume thrower. Perhaps he thrives only on hyper-efficiency, and needs an effective run game to be successful for fantasy. And thus, that a healthy J.K. Dobbins and Gus Edwards will do wonders for him in 2021. But then again, perhaps Jackson has finally been exposed as a (severely) limited passer, and this efficiency decline is part of a larger trend. Truthfully, I’m not too sure, but I don’t think this risk (and his poor strength of schedule) is being factored into his ADP (QB4). And, as such, I’d much prefer Kyler Murray who is being drafted a full three rounds later.

11) Justin Herbert finished 2nd in fantasy points per start last year (23.3) and currently ranks 2nd by ADP. He gets a significant schedule boost this season, worth an additional +0.56 FPG to his 2021 average. I think Herbert has untapped and underrated Konami Code upside, but in general, I don’t like to draft non-Konami Code QBs that high. But I believe strongly in his talent, so, if I go that route, I may have to bet on him to win MVP as an insurance policy (+1100).

Scott Barrett combines a unique background in philosophy and investing alongside a lifelong love of football and spreadsheets to serve as Fantasy Points’ Chief Executive Officer.